Ambergris Caye Directory
My Views on Mayoral Debate San Pedro Town Council
Ladies and gentlemen, voters of San Pedro, Ambergris Today is pleased to offer you an unbiased analysis of the Mayoral Debate held last night with the view of helping out those in the debate, in the planning and in the processes of making their decisions for Elections 2012.
I will begin by stating that I attended the debate with the view of finding the person that in my judgment will be a wise person with a vision and a plan, and an approachable person whom I can go talk to at The Town Hall. I believe that most of you tuned in to Reef Radio TV to do the same.
First of all I lament the fact that Mr. Daniel Guerrero was welcomed with a non functional microphone which I am sure distracted him momentarily. Secondly everyone observed and commented that the questions on the various topics were ridiculously long and distracting to all the candidates, especially the first one to answer. On the second topic, the question was a total of eight questions rolled up into one! Even worse was the fact that the presenter tried to put ideas in their heads with the manner the questions were framed. To say that there is much controversy on the town clock is wrongful because it is only assumed. The question should have simply been, “What is your position on the town clock?” Well enough on that.

In the opening statement, I say they all did well but would like to advise Mr. Daniel Guerrero not to give in all of his platform in one item; although they were great points, people got lost with too much information. Mrs. Conchita Flota gained good points with her cordiality in acknowledging the other two candidates and then mentioning to her humble origin and relating to her family values. Mrs. Melanie Paz did similarly well by encouraging unity in the town at the very start.
In this first segment I felt Danny hurt his campaign slightly by stating that he needs to focus on the youth because they are totally going astray and in the wrong direction. Conchita, on the other hand, mentioned that her interest is to help in creating jobs for the youth and offering activities that will keep them busy and productive. Young people can’t be all accused of going in the wrong direction.
On the topic of sustainable development, the item had a total of eight questions and could have been answered by a “Yes “ or “No”, but all candidates did well in addressing that important topic. It is my view that the topic on the town clock should not have been tabled because that is not a developmental issue for the three candidates but rather a decision of the UDP of the outgoing administration. It was not fair for Daniel to be put on the spot.
I thoroughly enjoyed the presentations of all three candidates on consultation, transparency, accountability, health, and master plan. Mel was definitely outstanding in presenting her view on tourism development, especially on the issue of promoting Ambergris Caye on our own initiatives, plus the BTB initiative.
In the last question, which was the only real good question, the two ladies were prominent in expressing their vision for San Pedro. I do not think it was too wise for Danny to say, and I quote. “I am here to run this town,”… as opposed to Conchita’s words, “I am here to serve the people, Remember that you are the bosses and we are the servants.”
It was clear that there were two candidates who are genuinely interested in the welfare of all the citizens of San Pedro and are humbly asking for your endorsement, come March 7, 2012.
Overall the Mayoral Debate was enlightening. It was more of a ‘Question and Answer” session as opposed to a real debate where the candidates could have thrown issue at each other, in a controlled environment. I wish I could have seen more of that. Although the questions were not fully conducive to powerful answers from the candidates, all three of them handled them very well.

Melanie Paz (Independent Mayoral Candidate), Daniel Guerrero (United Democratic Party), Conchita Flota (People's United Party)
There were a total of 13 questions during the debate that tackled the following topics: Mayor’s Responsibility, Island Subvention, Clock Tower/Controversies, Sustainable Development, Finance and Audits, Health Care, Master Plan, Police Relations/Crime, Property Tax, Tourism, Traffic, Transparency and Vision for the Community.
Mr. Daniel Guerrero’s Platform centered around community and tackling the negative aspects of it; asking for everybody’s cooperation. His strongholds during the debate included:
- Implementing tourism curriculum in all schools,
- Aggressive independent marketing
- Envisions community involvement, health and educating our youth

Mrs. Melanie Paz’s Platform centered on Unity and Transparency in where she envisions a united town council with no division of colors – a unification of people for the betterment of the island. “It’s not about politics, but about business” – she comments. Her strongholds during the debate included:
- Unification to deal with crime
- Show Central Government the value of their money in investing more of tax payers’ dollars in San Pedro
- In kind solutions for tax deductions for those who assist Town Council
- Represent Ambergris Caye in tourism by marketing ourselves to boost tourism
- Focus on Integrity

Mrs. Conchita Flota’s Platform was more about Family Values, Humility and Respect. She stressed on consultation with the community/stakeholders and recovering what we have lost and moving forward. Her strongholds during the debate included:
- Education and working alongside with sustainable development and creating jobs
- Commitment to reevaluate island Subvention and bring more money to San Pedro from GOB
- More Police Officers, Justice of the Peace supported programs and Police Substations
- Involve businesses and create financial committee to produce proper audit reports
- Equality in property tax payments – no exemptions
- Her vision is to be an efficient, fair and hardworking Mayor

Click Here for More Editorals On Ambergris Today Online
Comments
I wanted to see a debate! Not a question and answer. And yes the questions were wayyyyyyyyyyyyyy to long. In a debate you get to see the real person. Not an act! We want to see where they are really going with this town. And I do agree that the Ladies were more organized in their answers and want a change for the town. Danny had it harder becuase his party is in power and are doing bull for the town. So whatever he said would sound wrong. He also spoke in spanish because I think he can express himself better in spanish. And perhaps becuase there are people from other Central American countries that don't speak English. I also believe that those other Central American people should learn to speack English. We are an English speaking country. If I were to go and live in China I think I would need to learn Chinese! Good thing that most Belizeans are bilingual.
they weren't negative towards danny...it's probably because he didn't say much to redeem himself. you can't just be positive if there wasn't anything to be positive about. it's simply what was said!
Topics good. Questions too lengthy. Perhaps the organizers should get a team of intellectuals, in San Pedro where there are many, and have them frame the questions to make it simple and comfortable for the candidates. I felt they all did wellconsidering all odds. Yes the two ladies seemed to be more focused on issues and not on politics, but that is only my opinion.
Hey Dude, t least you are reading a good article. Go back and read and try to understand ii or come to SPH for some classes. You got it all wrong dude.
The questions were submitted by the public! I guess that's what it was supposed to be about. Having the concerns of the people addressed. I don't think that it was as bad as you are making it sound...
I submitted my questions and I guess that the Sun was trying to compile all questions in one. Maybe next time you guys host it and you read the questions? Will that be better?
I appreciate what they are doing and I do not see how it was biased...all three represented themselves as best they could in the debate. Why is it biased? Mel did an excellent job, Ms, Conch did too, and Danny is just...Danny. lol
Thanks,
I hate the animosity
Interesting. It would more unbiased if you had presented the question and answer. From your unbiased article I honestly felt you had a preference for mrs. Flota.
Please find negative things to say about Mrs. Flota and Mrs. Paz then..... cant..... right?????
Maybe you guys can plan the next debate!!!!! make it more interesting.. I think they need to be put on the spot.. These questions where questions that they expect to answer..... We need to see who they really are!!!
I really like your unbiased points.....
I would like to congradulate Ms. Conchita Flota for expressing her views in an exccellent manner. I believe that Melanie Paz also did well, but what I still don't get is why her slogan or whatever says "No politics - just Business".... Like seriously I believe that IS politics and looks Ridiculous because once you want to be mayor your are in politics. For Danny Guerrero I believe he sound sloppy... I mean he should have expressed himself in pure english because then spanish and English becomes Spanglish and it doesnt looks formal.
After all I think Ms. Conchita Flota is the ONE! So Vote for Ms. Conchita Flota as you can see she's very humble and hardworking!









PLEASE....LETS NOT HAVE ANOTHER ALCOHOLIC TOWN BOARD